In Mapp v.Ohio, the U.S.Supreme Court held that ______.
A) evidence seized in an unlawful search was to be excluded in federal courts
B) evidence seized in an unlawful search was to be excluded in state courts
C) federal police who seized evidence in an unlawful manner were subject to criminal prosecutions
D) state police who seized evidence in an unlawful manner were subject to criminal prosecutions
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q13: The _ provides that evidence that is
Q14: All of the following arguments are made
Q15: Before the creation of the exclusionary rule,
Q16: In Wolf v.Colorado, the U.S.Supreme Court _.
A)incorporated
Q17: Which of the following alternative procedures requires
Q19: The silver-platter doctrine was ruled unconstitutional in
Q20: Any evidence that is discovered as a
Q21: _ permits the use of unlawfully seized
Q22: _ is a request to the court
Q23: Which is the leading case in regard
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents