The 1833 case of Barron v. Baltimore revolved around the city of Baltimore's deprivation of

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The case of Barron v. Baltimore was centered around the deprivation of property. Specifically, the plaintiff, John Barron, argued that the city's construction of a wharf had caused siltation in the harbor that reduced the depth of the water around his own wharf and interfered with his business. However, the Supreme Court ultimately ruled that the Fifth Amendment's takings clause - which prohibits the government from taking private property for public use without just compensation - applied only to the federal government, not states or municipalities. This decision established the principle of "dual federalism," which holds that state and federal governments are separate and distinct entities with their own spheres of authority.

The 1833 Case of Barron V