Evidence that the defendant was seen running from the scene of the crime shortly after the crime occurred would be circumstantial evidence of guilt.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Circumstantial evidence is evidence that is not direct, but rather is inferred from events or circumstances that surround the crime. In this case, the defendant seen running from the scene of the crime could suggest guilt, but it is not direct evidence of guilt.

Evidence That the Defendant Was Seen Running from the Scene