Under the Federal Rules of Evidence and in a number of jurisdictions, which of the following is specifically defined as not being hearsay, even though it may appear to be hearsay?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Admission by a party opponent is specifically defined as not being hearsay because it is considered to be a statement made by a party to the case and therefore an admission against interest. This means it is more reliable and admissible as evidence. Unsworn statements made before a judge, statements by the victim of a crime, and statements by the judge at a prior trial are not specifically defined as not being hearsay.

Under the Federal Rules of Evidence and in a Number