In the Fahy v.Connecticut case, the court noted that there was no prejudicial effect of erroneously admitted evidence.

Name: In the Fahy v.Connecticut case, the court noted that there was no prejudicial effect of erroneously admitted evidence.
Brand: Quizplus
Rating: 4.8 (63 reviews)

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In the Fahy v. Connecticut case, the court found that the admission of prejudicial evidence could not be considered harmless error and reversed the defendant's conviction.

In the Fahy V