A trained drug-detection dog's alert is generally sufficient to
A) create probable cause.
B) excuse the warrant requirement.
C) excuse the exclusionary rule.
D) prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Use of a drug-detection dog during a
Q2: If police fear violence or destruction of
Q4: If officers naturally (by ear) overhear conversations
Q5: Much of the law of wiretapping and
Q6: Difficulty may occur in seizing evidence without
Q7: In Kyllo.v.U.S., the U.S.Supreme Court held that
Q8: A warrant authorizing covert entry into a
Q9: Consent to search a computer permits officers
Q10: Most wiretapping and electronic eavesdropping federal statutes
Q11: In _ v.U.S., the U.S.Supreme Court held
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents