In Katz v.U.S., the Court held that interceptions of communications were neither a Fourth Amendment search nor a Fourth Amendment seizure.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In Katz v. U.S., the Court held that the government's eavesdropping activities constituted a search and seizure under the Fourth Amendment, requiring a warrant, thus expanding the scope of the Fourth Amendment to protect individuals' privacy in their communications.

In Katz VU