The case of Near v.Minnesota established that the government could ban the publication of material that was "annoying and offensive to the public at large."

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The case of Near v. Minnesota actually established that prior restraint on publication was unconstitutional, even in instances where the material may be considered offensive or harmful. Therefore, the government cannot ban the publication of material simply because it is annoying or offensive to the public at large.

The Case of near V