In Carley V

In Carley v.Willow Park Golf Course Ltd.,what did the Court find?

A) The presence of a driving range constituted a private nuisance and issued an injunction prohibiting golf balls going onto their property.
B) The presence of a driving range constituted a private nuisance, but there is no remedy for a mere nuisance at law.
C) The presence of a driving range could not be considered a nuisance, only a minor annoyance, for which there is no remedy.
D) The presence of a driving range constituted negligence, as driving ranges are unreasonable.
E) The presence of a driving range could not be considered in the context of tort law, as the owners did not intend to cause harm.