Historically,libel was seen as more deliberate and more permanent and therefore more harmful than slander.Today,means of mass communication give slander a potentially huge audience,so the rationale for distinguishing between them is breaking down.Explain how the law is changing in light of this.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer of Historically,libel was seen as more deliberate and more permanent and therefore more harmful than slander.Today,means of mass communication give slander a potentially huge audience,so the rationale for distinguishing between them is breaking down.Explain how the law is changing in light of this.

Historically,libel Was Seen as More Deliberate and More Permanent and Therefore