Two real estate agents,pressed for time,stopped at the bakery for some muffins that would suffice as lunch.John bought the muffins and gave one to Mary.They both began to eat the muffins as they hurried to the car.When Mary looked at the muffin she had just bitten,she saw that the raisins had little worms in them.John's muffins were the same-with little worms.Given these facts,which of the following possibilities is true? (Read each independently from the others.)
A) Since Mary did not buy the muffins, she could not sue in contract, but if she were injured, she could sue in tort.
B) Even if Mary was not injured by eating the worms, she could sue the baker of the muffins for nuisance.
C) If Mary sued the baker of the muffins or the packer of the raisins, she would have to prove only one thing to win her case-that there were worms in the muffin.
D) Mary has a cause of action against the baker of the muffins only if she can prove that the baker used bad raisins on purpose.
E) Mary can do nothing as she did not purchase the muffins.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q7: Mr.Reasoner was looking out his livingroom window
Q8: Which of the following situations could not
Q9: Stella bought a cup of coffee at
Q10: Creative Farming Ltd.manufactures fertilizer from organic matter,a
Q11: As a result of careless driving,Mr.Boz accidentally
Q13: Sarah Iris,a middle-aged woman,was struck down as
Q14: Which of the following statements with regard
Q15: In Cooper v.Hobart,the issue was whether or
Q16: A seven-year-old boy followed his dog into
Q37: Which of the following statements describes the
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents