An employee prepared an appraisal of a property for his real-estate development company.The employee had been told that the appraisal would be used by the company to attract a potential investor,Mr.Jones,for the company's client,Mr.Lee.Because the appraiser carelessly forgot to check the recent changes in the zoning by-laws,the appraisal was not accurate.Mr.Jones was misled about the value of the land and suffered a financial loss of $20 000.Given these facts,which of the following is true?
A) Mr. Jones could not take any action because he had no contract with the company or the appraiser.
B) A person cannot be sued for words that cause loss, only for actions that cause physical injury.
C) If Jones sues the appraiser, he cannot also sue the employer company; he can only sue one or the other.
D) The cause of action most likely to be taken by the investor is defamation.
E) To win in an action against the appraiser, Jones must prove that the appraiser owed him a duty of care, fell below the standard of care owed and thereby caused him a foreseeable loss because of his reliance on the information.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q27: In Hodgkinson v. Simms, an accountant advised
Q44: A recent innovation in the insurance industry
Q45: Jack works as a financial-planning consultant for
Q47: _ provides only a benefit upon death,and
Q48: Which of the following is correct with
Q52: Often,a business suffering a loss from a
Q52: Which of the following statements does not
Q53: Which of the following is not an
Q55: To win his action in negligence against
Q75: Which of the following is correct with
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents