
In Mueller v. Wawanesa Insurance Co., insurance had been taken out on a house when it was being used as a residential dwelling. The building was occupied by three members of a motorcycle gang. The insurance company was not notified of the change. What was the result when the house was destroyed by fire?
A) The failure to notify of the change voided the policy and the insurance company did not have to pay.
B) The failure to notify of the change voided the policy, but the insurance company still had to cover the loss.
C) The failure to notify of the change was immaterial, because there was no proof that is what caused the fire.
D) The failure to notify of the change was immaterial, because there was no misrepresentation at the time the policy was taken out.
E) The failure to notify of the change resulted in the insured being charged higher premiums.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q41: In Heitsman v. Canadian Premier Life Insurance
Q42: _ provides only a benefit upon death,
Q45: Jack works as a financial-planning consultant for
Q46: _ is the type of insurance most
Q48: Which of the following is not an
Q49: Property insurance should correspond to the actual
Q52: Which of the following statements does not
Q54: Often, a business suffering a loss from
Q59: To win his action in negligence against
Q60: Joe entered a store and approached a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents