In B.C.,Mr.Buyer sued Mr.Seller for breach of contract because Mr.Seller failed to deliver a computer system on time in accordance with the contract.Mr.Seller argued that he was not in breach; that the contract had been frustrated.The computer was destroyed by water when a careless driver knocked over a fire hydrant outside the warehouse holding the computer.No deposit had been paid.The court held that the contract was frustrated.Given this ruling,how does the court handle the situation?
A) Buyer will succeed against Seller for damages because the court will treat it as if were an anticipatory breach.
B) The court will let the losses lie where they fell, despite any of Seller's costs in preparing the computer system.
C) Buyer will not have to pay anything to Seller unless Seller had requested a deposit at the time of contract.
D) The court will look at the costs incurred and any payments made, and will apportion the losses between the parties.
E) The court will treat the contract as if there were a common mistake about the existence of the subject matter.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q16: Which one of the following is false
Q23: In which of the following situations would
Q46: If a contract states that the contract
Q47: In all but one of the following
Q47: The claim of frustration is not available
Q48: In a jurisdiction other than B.C.,Mr.Buyer sued
Q50: Monroe sold computers.On the purchase of a
Q53: If neighbours have a contract agreeing not
Q55: Which one of the following does not
Q56: A term in a contract that says
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents