In the case of Herff Jones Canada Inc.v.Todd,the Court considered a clause in a sales representative contract that prohibited the representative from working for a competitor for four years.What did the Court hold?
A) The covenant was enforced despite been overly excessive, on the basis of the principle of the freedom to contract.
B) The covenant was enforced because it was reasonable between the parties and reasonable with regard to the public interest.
C) The covenant was void because such provisions are in restraint of trade and therefore automatically illegal.
D) The covenant was unenforceable because it was not under seal.
E) The covenant was unenforceable because such covenants demand independent legal advice prior to execution and none was obtained.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q5: With regard to employment law, which of
Q28: In Robichaud v. Canada (Treasury Board), the
Q31: Which of the following is correct with
Q37: Federal and provincial human rights legislation cover
Q43: The only kind of disagreement between union
Q44: Mr.Lopez,the owner of the firm,had a large
Q46: In Dowling v.Ontario (Workplace Safety and Insurance
Q49: Which of the following statements more accurately
Q51: When an employer demotes the employee or
Q52: Keeping in mind both the common law
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents