Consider the decision in Agrium Inc.v.Hamilton.What did the Court find?
A) Hamilton, as a director and majority shareholder of Flagstaff, was in a fiduciary relationship with Agrium, a minority shareholder.
B) Hamilton was liable for insider trading.
C) Hamilton, as a director and majority shareholder of Flagstaff, was not in a fiduciary relationship with Agrium, a minority shareholder.
D) Hamilton was liable for fraudulent misrepresentation.
E) Hamilton's action did not constitute oppressive conduct.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q16: Another term commonly used where a bond
Q38: Jack Kihn incorporated and put $20 000
Q39: Your friend Harry became wealthy through the
Q40: Which two of the following are examples
Q41: When shares are involved,even preferred shares,there is
Q43: In Salomon v.Salomon & Co.,Mr.Salomon incorporated a
Q47: The corporation typically makes a debt commitment
Q50: Andrea agreed to form a corporation with
Q51: Mr. Malik, an investment counsellor by training,
Q52: Kent incorporated provincially. The corporation worked with
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents