What did the Supreme Court rule in Hamdi v.Rumsfeld (2004) ?
A) The actions of a president are not subject to judicial review.
B) The president does not have the authority to declare individuals to be "enemy combatants."
C) Hamdi was entitled to a lawyer and an opportunity to rebut the government's charges against him.
D) During a time of war, the president's power as commander in chief is unlimited.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q75: The Supreme Court has ruled that the
Q77: The requirement of standing means that parties
Q77: A certiorari pool describes the
A)computerized lottery system
Q78: The Supreme Court struck down state laws
Q79: The Supreme Court's power to review acts
Q81: Under normal rules of oral argument, each
Q82: When a justice agrees with the majority
Q83: The solicitor general is the _-ranking official
Q84: In Roe v.Wade (1973), the Supreme Court
Q85: When interest groups use a "pattern-of-cases" strategy,
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents