The fact that the defendant had the means to commit the crime is admissible as circumstantial evidence of guilt.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The fact that the defendant had the means to commit the crime is considered relevant as circumstantial evidence of guilt. Circumstantial evidence refers to all evidence that is not direct but helps prove something else by inference, such as motive, opportunity, or means to commit the crime. Therefore, the means available to the defendant are often relevant and admissible in court.

The Fact That the Defendant Had the Means to Commit