Testimony regarding the defendant's efforts to destroy evidence is admissible as circumstantial evidence of guilt.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Testimony regarding the defendant's efforts to destroy evidence can be admitted as circumstantial evidence of guilt because it suggests that the defendant had something to hide and was trying to cover up their involvement in the alleged wrongdoing. However, the admissibility of such testimony depends on the specific facts and circumstances of the case, and the credibility of the witness providing the testimony.

Testimony Regarding the Defendant's Efforts to Destroy Evidence Is Admissible