If the defendant testifies that it was physically impossible for him to have committed a crime because he had a bad back and could not lift the heavy object that was stolen:

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

If the jurors believe the defendant's testimony that he had a bad back and could not physically lift the object that was stolen, they could infer that he is not guilty of the crime. However, it is ultimately up to the jurors to weigh the credibility of the defendant's testimony and determine if it is convincing enough to establish reasonable doubt. The other choices are not necessarily applicable in this scenario, as expert testimony and documentation of physical disability may not be necessary if the jurors believe the defendant's testimony.

If the Defendant Testifies That It Was Physically Impossible for Him