Prior consistent statements are admissible:
A) To impeach a witness
B) To rehabilitate a witness
C) To corroborate testimony
D) Prior consistent statements are admissible for all of these purposes
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q31: A co-conspirator's statement can be used at
Q32: Admissions of a party to the case
Q33: Which exception to the Hearsay Rule is
Q34: The Ancient Documents Exception to the Hearsay
Q35: Under the Mental and Physical State Exception
Q37: When would a statement made to a
Q38: Which is more important under the Dying
Q39: Statements admitted under the Mental and Physical
Q40: To be admissible under the Reputation Exception
Q41: Will Lewis be allowed to testify that
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents