While conducting an audit, Larson Associates, CPAs, failed to detect material misstatements included in its client's financial statements. Larson's unqualified opinion was included with the financial statements in a registration statement and prospectus for a public offering of securities made by the client. Larson knew that its opinion and the financial statements would be used for this purpose. In suit by a purchaser against Larson for common-law fraud, Larson's best defense would be that:
A) Larson did not have actual or constructive knowledge of the misstatements and the auditor followed PCAOB Auditing Standards in the audit.
B) Larson's client knew or should have known of the misstatements.
C) Larson did not have actual knowledge that the purchaser was an intended beneficiary of the audit.
D) Larson was not in privity of contract with its client.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q50: Under the liability provisions of Section 11
Q51: Which of the following is the best
Q52: Suits are often brought against auditors that
Q53: This act increased legal protections available to
Q54: Auditors can be held liable under two
Q56: The most restrictive view under common law
Q57: Under the antifraud provisions of Section 10(b)of
Q58: When performing an audit, a CPA will
Q59: Ocean and Associates, CPAs, audited the financial
Q60: In regards to the Foreign Corrupt Practices
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents