What was the essential ruling in Jackson v. Indiana?
A) Psychoactive medication could not be given to incompetent defendants.
B) Psychoactive medication could not be given to defendants found insane.
C) Incompetent defendants could not be hospitalized indefinitely if no progress was made to restore them.
D) Persons found insane could not be hospitalized indefinitely.
E) The deinstitutionalization of all psychiatric patients.

Question

What was the essential ruling in Jackson v. Indiana?
A) Psychoactive medication could not be given to incompetent defendants.
B) Psychoactive medication could not be given to defendants found insane.
C) Incompetent defendants could not be hospitalized indefinitely if no progress was made 	 	to restore them.
D) Persons found insane could not be hospitalized indefinitely.
E) The deinstitutionalization of all psychiatric patients.

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The essential ruling in Jackson v. Indiana was that incompetent defendants could not be hospitalized indefinitely if no progress was made to restore them. This decision was based on the principle that the constitutional rights of individuals must be respected, including the right to due process and the right to be free from unnecessary institutionalization. The Court held that individuals who were unable to stand trial and unlikely to attain the capacity to do so within a reasonable time had a right to a judicial determination of their need for continued hospitalization, and that this determination must be made on a periodic basis.

What Was the Essential Ruling in Jackson V