The doctrines of federalism and separation of powers prohibit the federal government from interfering with states where there is no direct connection to a constitutionally delegated federal power.As a result,attempts at federal gun control were found unconstitutional in the cases of United States v.Lopez and Printz v.United States.Assuming that the court's interpretation of the law was accurate,do you believe that the states' power to regulate in these matters should outweigh the federal government's right to do so? What,if anything,should be done?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer of The doctrines of federalism and separation of powers prohibit the federal government from interfering with states where there is no direct connection to a constitutionally delegated federal power.As a result,attempts at federal gun control were found unconstitutional in the cases of United States v.Lopez and Printz v.United States.Assuming that the court's interpretation of the law was accurate,do you believe that the states' power to regulate in these matters should outweigh the federal government's right to do so? What,if anything,should be done?

The Doctrines of Federalism and Separation of Powers Prohibit the Federal