In a split 5-4 decision,the U.S.Supreme Court held in Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v.Winn,131 S.Ct.1436 (2011)that taxpayers lacked standing to bring an action alleging that an Arizona statute,which granted tuition tax credits to income taxpayers who contributed money to "student tuition organizations" (STO)that used the contributions to provide scholarships to students attending private schools,including religious schools,violated the First Amendment's Establishment Clause.Justice Kennedy wrote the opinion of the court holding that the taxpayers lacked standing.Justice Kagan filed a dissenting opinion,in which Justices Ginsburg,Breyer,and Sotomayor joined.Discuss whether you agree with the majority opinion or the dissenting opinion in the case.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer of In a split 5-4 decision,the U.S.Supreme Court held in Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v.Winn,131 S.Ct.1436 (2011)that taxpayers lacked standing to bring an action alleging that an Arizona statute,which granted tuition tax credits to income taxpayers who contributed money to "student tuition organizations" (STO)that used the contributions to provide scholarships to students attending private schools,including religious schools,violated the First Amendment's Establishment Clause.Justice Kennedy wrote the opinion of the court holding that the taxpayers lacked standing.Justice Kagan filed a dissenting opinion,in which Justices Ginsburg,Breyer,and Sotomayor joined.Discuss whether you agree with the majority opinion or the dissenting opinion in the case.

In a Split 5-4 Decision,the U