Which of the following was the conclusion in the Price v.High Pointe Oil Company,Inc.case in the text?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In Price,the plaintiff recovered all economic losses resulting from High Pointe's error (negligent destruction of property)but sued for noneconomic losses-pain and suffering,humiliation,embarrassment,and emotional distress.A jury found in her favor and awarded her $100,000 in damages.The Michigan Supreme Court looked at the common-law rule for damages in such circumstances and concluded no Michigan case has ever allowed a plaintiff to recover noneconomic damages resulting from negligent destruction of property.Therefore,the court declined to extend the common-law rule in the plaintiff's case.

Which of the Following Was the Conclusion in the Price