In Farrell v.Macy's Retail Holdings,Inc. ,the case in the text,the court held that Macy's was not liable for false imprisonment because its employees:
A) acted subjectively reasonable under the circumstances.
B) recognized the Farrells and had suspected them to be shoplifters before.
C) noticed the plaintiffs had walked past all points of sale.
D) had probable cause to detain the Farrells and as such,was protected under the state's shopkeeper's statute.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q71: If there is a serious interference and
Q72: As discussed in Neumann v.Liles,the case in
Q73: In the context of conversion,if there is
Q74: Which of the following is generally true
Q75: In Mathias v.Accor Economy Lodging Inc. ,the
Q77: _ to land may be defined as
Q78: If the only harm a plaintiff landowner
Q79: In the case in the text,Durham v.McDonald's
Q80: Ken,a car mechanic,agreed to repair the bumper
Q81: In Obsidian Finance Group,LLC v.Cox,the case in
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents