In Bertrand V

In Bertrand v.Mullin,the case in the text,the court held that:

A) the evidence demonstrated that the defendant's failure to write the advertisement in a different way amounted to actual malice.
B) the evidence demonstrated that the defendant had a high degree of subjective awareness of falsity.
C) the evidence failed to show actual malice and the plaintiff could not establish a defamation claim.
D) the evidence failed to show that the defendant knowingly made a false statement.