With the emergence of comparative negligence and comparative fault,some states have eliminated assumption of risk as a defense.Does this mean that the plaintiff's knowledge of the risk and his voluntary acceptance of it have no role to play in negligence law? Why or why not?
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q80: Which of the following is not subject
Q81: Which of the following is not considered
Q82: What are the strategies followed by the
Q83: Tom and Tim both negligently start their
Q84: In the case in the text,Black v.William
Q85: The _ test provides that the defendant's
Q86: State X has a law requiring that
Q87: Strict liability makes people liable irrespective of
Q88: As explored in the case in the
Q90: Don starts a fire that soon consumes
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents