In Coleman v.Retina Consultants,P.C. ,the case in the text,the court held that:
A)the noncompetition clause in the Software Agreement was enforceable as a matter of law.
B)Retina could only prohibit Coleman from marketing the program with a noncompetition agreement.
C)the plain language of the injunction exceeded the scope required of Coleman pursuant to the terms of the Software Agreement.
D)the software was not a trade secret because it's coding was available to the public.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The court held that by prohibiting Coleman from retaining any and all information and documentation related to Clinex,the plain language of the injunction erroneously went beyond the scope of that which was required of Coleman pursuant to the terms of the Software Agreement and beyond what misappropriation of trade secrets principles permit.

In Coleman V