In the case in the text,Trapani Construction Co.v.Elliot Group,Inc. ,the court held that:
A) There was a contract implied in fact because the circumstances and behaviors of the parties demonstrated a general course of dealing and a mutual intent to contract.
B) There was no contract implied in fact because the defendant never accepted the plaintiff's offer.
C) There was no contract implied in fact because no consideration was provided to defendant.
D) There was no contract implied in fact because there was no meeting of the minds or mutual assent.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q67: Which of the following is true regarding
Q68: Mark,an attorney,accepts an offer for an attorney
Q69: The text discusses that the drafters of
Q70: Jim purchased software on a CD-ROM disc
Q71: _ is the ability to incur legal
Q73: A fundamental difference between promissory estoppel and
Q74: Pancake House,a local breakfast diner,issues "frequent buyer"
Q75: Fun Foods fraudulently induces Holly to buy
Q76: The _ of contracts is court-made law
Q77: In Audio Visual Artistry v.Tanzer,the case in
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents