In Thomas v.Archer,the case in the text,the Alaska Supreme Court held that the trial court erred when it decided that:
A)enforcement of the promise was not necessary in the interest of justice.
B)there was no actual promise.
C)the Thomases change in position was not foreseeable.
D)the Thomases failed to show a substantial change in position.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The court found that the trial court erred when it concluded that even if all other elements of promissory estoppel were met,the Thomases "fail to show a substantial change in position" because of Rachel's testimony that she "would have gone to Swedish even if she knew the [medivac] would not be covered."

In Thomas V