In Cordas V

In Cordas v.Uber Technologies,Inc. ,the case in the text,the court held that:

A) Uber's terms and conditions constituted an enforceable browsewrap agreement.
B) Uber's arbitration clause was unenforceable because it did not require an affirmative assent from its users.
C) Uber's arbitration clause was enforceable because Cordas downloaded the app voluntarily.
D) Uber's arbitration clause was enforceable because Cordas affirmatively acknowledged it.