Ron was employed by Mass Co.in 1970.At that time,he was given an employee handbook that described the particular steps that had to be taken before an employee could be fired.Later,in 2000,Mass published a new handbook by which all workers' statuses were changed to at-will employees.Mass then fired Ron.Ron claimed he was terminated without cause and was not afforded procedures described in the 1970 handbook,such as an appeal or review of the decision.He sued Mass under breach of contract based upon the 1970 employee handbook.Will he succeed?
A) Yes,because the modifications in 2000 were not by mutual consent and for consideration.
B) No,because the employee handbook contains terms and conditions of the employment contract.
C) Yes,because Mass Co.has arbitrarily terminated Ron.
D) No,because Ron had acquiesced to the modification by not raising any objection.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q53: Able borrowed $10,000 from Baker,promising to return
Q54: A contract that involves obligations on the
Q55: Helen worked for ABC Motors for 25
Q56: Which of the following is an exception
Q57: The settlement of an unliquidated debt is
Q59: Gift promises are not generally enforceable because
Q60: Can a local businessman pay a police
Q61: A promise to perform a preexisting duty
Q62: A promisee's promise not to commit a
Q63: In a(n)_ contract,the distributor must use her
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents