In Timothy v.Keetch,the case in the text,the court held that:
A)Utah law requires one to inspect the public record to verify the truthfulness of statements made to him or her.
B)Paul's visit to the ranch should have "served as a warning" that the Timothys were being deceived.
C)the Keetches justifiably represented that they owned the horse without any encumbrances.
D)the Timothys had no reason to know that they were being deceived.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The court held that the Timothys were not required to check for prior UCC filings on the horse.The Keetches unqualifiedly represented that they owned the horse free of prior encumbrances.Nothing in the transaction,in the Keetches' representations,in Paul's visit to the ranch,or in the inquiries the Timothys made suggested anything that would "serve as a warning" that they were being deceived.

In Timothy V