In the case in the text,Olmstead v.Saint Paul Public Schools,the court held that:
A)Olmstead could not demonstrate that his free will was overcome.
B)Olmstead's resignation was revocable because when he resigned he was under duress.
C)Olmstead was under duress when the District threated to file termination charges against Olmstead when it had no intention or grounds to do so.
D)the District illegally promised to not report Olmstead if he resigned.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The court held that Olmsted could not demonstrate that his free will was overcome and no evidence supported the allegation that the District made an unlawful threat.

In the Case in the Text,Olmstead V