Shoddy,the owner of Shoe Repair,was contemplating retirement.He therefore contracted to sell his business to Pauline Parker.Shoe Repair was located in Hoosierburg,Indiana,which has a population of 5,233.Apart from containing a provision entitling Parker to use the Shoe Repair name for the business,the parties' contract included a clause that prohibited Shoddy from opening any competing shoe repair shop in Hoosierburg for a period of one year from the date of the parties' contract.Two months after the date of the contract (and one and one-half months after the sale of the business to Parker had been completed),Shoddy grew tired of retirement.As shoe repair had been his life's work,he opened up a shoe repair shop in Hoosierburg.Parker sued him in an effort to obtain an injunction against his operation of the competing business,alleging a violation of the parties' contract.How is the court likely to rule? Explain your reasoning.
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q80: The fact that statutes requiring a license
Q81: There must be separate _ for each
Q82: Jan opens a sandwich shop across the
Q83: 84 To encourage people to cancel illegal
Q84: If a consumer is presented with a
Q85: What is an exculpatory clause?
Q86: In the case in the text,Gamboa v.Alcarado,what
Q87: Jerry and Louise contract for Jerry to
Q89: In Singh v.Uber Technologies Inc. ,the case
Q90: Describe the three criteria that need to
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents