In the case in the text,Beer v.Bennett,the trial court ordered Beer to hold the Fiat for Bennett until Bennett made shipping arrangements.On review,the court held that this requirement:
A)was proper under the UCC and Beer must hold the Fiat with reasonable care.
B)was proper under the UCC and Beer was responsible for any additional expenses.
C)was improper under the UCC because this placed an undue burden on Beer.
D)was improper under the UCC because Beer was willing to make arrangements to send the Fiat to Bennett.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The court held that where the buyer has physical possession of the goods,and after the seller has repaid the purchase price,the nonmerchant's only duty with respect to the goods is to hold them with reasonable care at the seller's disposition for a time sufficient to permit the seller to remove them.The remedy ordered here-return of the purchase price to Beer and return of the Fiat to Bennett upon his payment of the judgment and his arrangements for return shipment and payment for the same-was entirely proper under the UCC.

In the Case in the Text,Beer V