Chloe took her watch to a jeweler to have it repaired.While the jeweler had possession of the watch,a thief broke into the shop.The thief stole Chloe's watch and other jewelry pieces.Which of the following is true?
A) Because this was a bailment for the benefit of the jeweler,the jeweler is strictly liable to Chloe for the value of the watch.
B) This was a mutual benefit bailment,meaning that the jeweler is liable to Chloe if he did not use reasonable care to protect the watch.
C) No bailment existed between Chloe and the jeweler.
D) Because this was a bailment for the benefit of Chloe,the jeweler cannot be held liable to her.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q42: What level of care must a bailee
Q43: Marjorie leaves her bag in the checkroom
Q44: In which of the following circumstances would
Q45: Debbie gives Barry a Cartier watch as
Q46: Why is a conditional gift considered to
Q48: Boris borrowed Martha's lawnmower to cut his
Q49: A gift inter vivos is a gift:
A)made
Q50: The Uniform Transfers to Minors Act:
A)permits the
Q51: In a bailment,the bailee is liable for
Q52: Which of these is an essential element
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents