In Gyamfoah v.EG&G Dynatrend,the case in the text,the court found that:
A)EG&G proved that the watches were never delivered to the warehouse.
B)EG&G met its burden of proving that the loss was not a result of its own negligence.
C)Gyamfoah failed to rebut the presumption of negligence.
D)Gyamfoah proved by a preponderance of the evidence that EG&G was liable for the loss.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The court held that Gyamfoah proved by a preponderance of the evidence that EG&G was liable for the loss of 2,518 watches.

In Gyamfoah V