In the case in the text,Ballard v.Dornic,the court held that:
A)Dornic did not limit his right to partition by a voluntary act.
B)a joint tenant voluntarily restricts his right to partition if he has not paid his share of expenses.
C)the parties expressed their intent not to partition.
D)the property could be physically divided without loss or injury to the parties.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The court concluded that the trial court did not err in rejecting Mr.Ballard's theory that Mr.Dornic limited his right to partition by a voluntary act.

In the Case in the Text,Ballard V