Solved

In Brooks V

Question 67

Multiple Choice

In Brooks v.Lewin Realty III,Inc. ,the case in the text,the court held that:

A) the landlord could be liable for injuries to a child that were caused by the landlord's breach of the implied warranty of habitability.
B) the landlord could not be liable for injuries to a child when the landlord had no duty to keep the rental premises in repair during the lease term.
C) the landlord could not be liable for injuries to a child when the landlord had no duty to inspect the rental premises during the lease term.
D) the landlord could be liable for injuries to a child that were caused by the landlord's failure to comply with the city's housing code.

Correct Answer: