In the case in the text,In re Borden,the court concluded that when an artisan loses possession involuntarily:
A)the artisan does not necessarily lose the artisan's lien.
B)the artisan always loses the artisan's lien.
C)the artisan always retains the artisan's lien.
D)the artisan's security interest still has top priority.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The court concluded that where the artisan loses possession involuntarily,the artisan does not necessarily lose the artisan's lien.Likewise,a conditional release of goods does not necessarily defeat the artisan's lien.This result follows at least with respect to holders of prior security interests who are not impaired by the conditional release.Some courts hold that an artisan's lien lost when possession is lost is revived upon resumption of possession.Such a lien retains its priority as before the release except that the lien is subordinate to the interests of a bona fide purchaser or a creditor who attached or levied on the property while it was in the possession of the owner.

In the Case in the Text,In Re Borden,the Court Concluded