In the case in the text Lehigh Presbytery v.Merchants Bancorp,why did the court find in favor of Lehigh Presbytery?
A) Because the bank's employee was part of Hunsberger's scheme to steal money from the church.
B) Because the evidence demonstrated the bank knew the checks contained a restrictive indorsement and disregarded it anyway.
C) Because the check contained a restrictive indorsement and the bank had an unwaivable obligation to follow it.
D) Because the bank employees removed the restrictive indorsements from the checks.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q70: Jack Roberts indorsed his paycheck "For Deposit
Q71: A promissory note cannot be scanned into
Q72: In the case in the text Town
Q73: Which of the following is generally true
Q74: Which of the following is a personal
Q76: If a person who takes a negotiable
Q77: To be a holder,a person must have
Q78: What is the term for when law
Q79: Which of the following is not a
Q80: Tom contracts with Susan to build her
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents