In case in the text Bank of America,N.A.v.Inda,why did the court hold that the bank was the holder of the note despite the fact that it transferred the beneficial interest to another entity and was only acting as the servicer of the loan?
A) The bank showed that it was a holder in due course.
B) The bank showed that its successor had transferred the note back to it.
C) The bank showed the chain of indorsements.
D) The bank showed that the note was payable to it or in blank and that it remained in possession of the note.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q58: If a negotiable instrument is payable on
Q59: In general,the alteration of a completed negotiable
Q60: A _ indorsement can be used with
Q61: With limited exceptions,a _ indorsement is not
Q62: _ indorsements are those when an indorser
Q64: The City mails Joe Marsh a refund
Q65: A _ indorsement contains the signature of
Q66: A(n)_ takes a negotiable instrument free of
Q67: A _ indorsement is one that specifies
Q68: A bank or person who _ an
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents