The state of Indiana hires the Reliable Construction Company to do some excavation work on an interstate highway.The state lays out the general objectives that Reliable has to achieve,but the details of the job are up to Reliable.The job involves digging holes ten feet deep,the whole way,across the highway.Given the nature of the job,it's important that Reliable be especially careful in putting up flashers and warning signs to steer oncoming motorists onto a detour.Reliable,however,does not do an adequate job in this regard and motorists are continually driving their cars into the construction area at high speed.One of these drivers,Tim,is unable to stop in time,and drives his car into the hole,suffering severe personal injury and damage to his car.Tim sues Reliable and the state for Reliable's negligence.In this case:
A) the state is liable under the doctrine of respondeat superior.
B) the state is not liable because Reliable is an independent contractor.
C) the state is liable for Reliable's failure to take requisite special precautions.
D) the state is not liable because it was not negligent.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q69: Stan hired Mason to work as a
Q70: Sandra hired Jeff to work as a
Q71: Phillips hires Addis,who had sixteen prior convictions
Q72: When is a principal directly liable for
Q73: If an agent has,within the scope of
Q75: A(n)_ case involves harm caused by the
Q76: Nina hired Sue to work as a
Q77: When is a principal directly liable for
Q78: A principal will not be liable to
Q79: Principals may try to escape liability for
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents