In Supply Chain Assocs. ,LLC v.ACT Elecs. ,Inc. ,the case in the text,which of the following was not a factor the court considered when it determined that the corporate veil should not be pierced?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The court held that although Sun Act was a controlling shareholder of ACT,it did not own all of ACT's stock.It supplied ACT with some operating funds.ACT conducted some business that benefited the Defendants.But,separate corporate boundaries were maintained,and third parties did not think of themselves as dealing with Sun Capital directly.Supply Chain and Estream entered into a conventional brokering sales arrangement with ACT,and were not misled into doing so on the belief it was doing business with one of the Defendants.