In SmithStearn Yachts,Inc.v.Gyrographic Communications,Inc. ,the case in the text,why did the court deny the defendant's motion to dismiss?
A) The plaintiff was able to demonstrate that it intended the original corporation to be the primary on the contract with defendant.
B) The plaintiff corporation ratified the agreement between the defendant and the corporation that never came into existence.
C) The defendant failed to render services promised under the service agreement with the plaintiff.
D) The defendant's agent failed to disclose the corporation's identity when contracting with the plaintiff.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q56: Which of the following is included in
Q57: Under the MBCA,which of the following is
Q58: A bank may lend money to a
Q59: _ shares are shares that have been
Q60: The Statutory Close Corporation Supplement to the
Q62: In the case in the text,Coyle v.Schwartz,the
Q63: Consent restraints and provisions disqualifying purchasers may
Q64: Which of the following would be used
Q65: Which of the following is not a
Q66: Under the MBCA,a purchaser of shares that
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents