In the case in the text,Krupinski v.Deyesso,what did the court decide would be improper for it to determine on summary judgment?
A)Whether a breach of contract occurred between the promoter and the corporation.
B)Whether a person was actually a promoter.
C)Whether the promoter breached his fiduciary duty.
D)Whether the plaintiff was entitled to damages.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The court ultimately holds that whether a person is actually a promoter is a question of fact and thus is a question that is improper for the court to determine on summary judgment.

In the Case in the Text,Krupinski V