In Brehm V

In Brehm v.Eisner,the case in the text,the court concluded that:

A) the defendants could not meet the requirements of the business judgment rule because Eisner acted quickly without researching and consulting others.
B) Eisner breached the fiduciary duty he owed when he hired a friend to be president when there were more qualified candidates.
C) the decisions of defendants through all interactions with Ovitz were protected business judgments.
D) Disney had cause to fire Ovitz because his conduct while serving as president violated the agreement.